McDonald v. State

700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 26, 1997
DocketNo. 96-02249
StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 85 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. State, 700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mr. McDonald’s convictions and sentences for trespass, burglary, and petit theft. Because the trial court erred in failing to give Mr. McDonald notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee, on remand Mr. McDonald shall have thirty days front the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the lien. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA1997).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
694 So. 2d 838 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.