McDonald v. State
700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 751 So. 2d 56 →
Opinion
We affirm Mr. McDonald’s convictions and sentences for trespass, burglary, and petit theft. Because the trial court erred in failing to give Mr. McDonald notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee, on remand Mr. McDonald shall have thirty days front the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the lien. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA1997).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. State, 700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
700 So. 2d 85 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
694 So. 2d 838 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)