McDonald v. State
This text of 700 So. 2d 85 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Mr. McDonald’s convictions and sentences for trespass, burglary, and petit theft. Because the trial court erred in failing to give Mr. McDonald notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee, on remand Mr. McDonald shall have thirty days front the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the lien. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA1997).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 So. 2d 85, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852, 1997 WL 594048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.