Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

632 So. 2d 136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 789, 1994 WL 34018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 1994
DocketNo. 93-0329
StatusPublished

This text of 632 So. 2d 136 (Anderson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anderson v. State, 632 So. 2d 136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 789, 1994 WL 34018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction on the authority of Smith v. State, 632 So.2d 136, Case No. 93-0189, opinion issued February 9, 1994. The state concedes a sentencing error because the written sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement, and we therefore reverse and remand for resen-tencing in conformance with the oral pronouncement of sentence.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
632 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 136, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 789, 1994 WL 34018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.