Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State

602 So. 2d 585, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6680, 1992 WL 138781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Anderson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 549 So. 2d 807 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1992·No. No. 91-0878·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentence. On remand, the trial court shall make specific findings on the record pursuant to sections 775.084(l)(a) and 775.-084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), to support the habitual offender sentence. See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985) (failure to object in trial court to habitual offender sentence without statutory findings does not bar defendant from raising issue on direct appeal from sentence); King v. State, 580 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (en banc) (upon remand from defective habitual offender sentence, trial court is free to reimpose habitual offender sen-fence upon compliance with requirement for statutory findings); Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (same).

We also adopt the question certified in Bryant as one of great public importance.

GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur. FARMER, J., specially concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anderson v. State, 602 So. 2d 585, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6680, 1992 WL 138781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

602 So. 2d 585 (Anderson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
462 So. 2d 452 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Van Bryant v. State
602 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
King v. State
580 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Murray v. State
602 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)