Home/Veterans Claims/Mayfield v. Nicholson

Mayfield v. Nicholson

19 Vet. App. 220, 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 304, 2005 WL 1253325
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
DecidedMay 27, 2005
DocketNo. 02-1077
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 19 Vet. App. 220 (Mayfield v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayfield v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 220, 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 304, 2005 WL 1253325 (Cal. 2005).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

During the internal circulation of the panel decision in this matter, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V.(b)(5).

On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Peake
22 Vet. App. 381 (Veterans Claims, 2009)
Marvin Robinson v. James B. Peake
Veterans Claims, 2008
Angel Vazquez -Flores v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 37 (Veterans Claims, 2008)
Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson
20 Vet. App. 494 (Veterans Claims, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Vet. App. 220, 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 304, 2005 WL 1253325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayfield-v-nicholson-cavc-2005.