Mayfield v. Nicholson
19 Vet. App. 220, 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 304, 2005 WL 1253325
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided May 27, 2005·No. No. 02-1077·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
ORDER
During the internal circulation of the panel decision in this matter, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V.(b)(5).
On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is
ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mayfield v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 220, 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 304, 2005 WL 1253325 (Cal. 2005).
19 Vet. App. 220 (Mayfield v. Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Peake
22 Vet. App. 381 (Veterans Claims, 2009)
Marvin Robinson v. James B. Peake
Veterans Claims, 2008
Angel Vazquez -Flores v. James B. Peake
22 Vet. App. 37 (Veterans Claims, 2008)
Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James Nicholson
20 Vet. App. 494 (Veterans Claims, 2006)