Robinson v. Peake

Veterans Claims

Robinson v. Peake

22 Vet. App. 381, 2008 WL 7390593

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided February 27, 2009·No. No. 04-1690·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On January 29, 2008, the Court issued a panel decision in the above-captioned appeal, affirming the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied the appellant VA service connection for heart disease and a thyroid disability. See Robinson v. Mansfield, 21 Vet.App. 545 (2008). Prior to the issuance of Robinson, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).

[382] Upon consideration of the foregoing, and there being no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On January 29, 2008, the Court issued a panel decision in the above-captioned appeal, affirming the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied the appellant VA service connection for heart disease and a thyroid disability. See Robinson v. Mansfield, 21 Vet.App. 545 (2008). Prior to the issuance of Robinson, two judges requested full-Court consideration. See Court’s Internal Operating Procedures ¶ V(b)(5).

[382] Upon consideration of the foregoing, and there being no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

Robinson v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 381, 2008 WL 7390593 (Cal. 2009).

Pincite

22 Vet. App. 381 (Robinson v. Peake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related