Matter of Tucker v. Annucci

204 A.D.3d 1286, 165 N.Y.S.3d 388, 2022 NY Slip Op 02602
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 2022
Docket533644
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 204 A.D.3d 1286 (Matter of Tucker v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Tucker v. Annucci, 204 A.D.3d 1286, 165 N.Y.S.3d 388, 2022 NY Slip Op 02602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Tucker v Annucci (2022 NY Slip Op 02602)
Matter of Tucker v Annucci
2022 NY Slip Op 02602
Decided on April 21, 2022
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:April 21, 2022

533644

[*1]In the Matter of Clarence Tucker, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date:March 18, 2022
Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Ceresia, JJ.

Clarence Tucker, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Martin Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's institutional account. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Dominguez v Wendland, 196 AD3d 991, 991-992 [2021]; Matter of Santana v Annucci, 190 AD3d 1182, 1183 [2021]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Ceresia, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Valdez-Cruz v. Collado
219 A.D.3d 1652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Perkins v. Annucci
2023 NY Slip Op 02820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Jefferies v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
177 N.Y.S.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Hill v. Annucci
208 A.D.3d 1530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Harrell v. Annucci
208 A.D.3d 1533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Morgan v. Rodriguez
170 N.Y.S.3d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.3d 1286, 165 N.Y.S.3d 388, 2022 NY Slip Op 02602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tucker-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2022.