Matter of Perkins v. Annucci

2023 NY Slip Op 02820
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 2023
Docket536147
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 02820 (Matter of Perkins v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Perkins v. Annucci, 2023 NY Slip Op 02820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Matter of Perkins v Annucci (2023 NY Slip Op 02820)
Matter of Perkins v Annucci
2023 NY Slip Op 02820
Decided on May 25, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:May 25, 2023

536147

[*1]In the Matter of Nayshawn Perkins, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date:April 21, 2023
Before:Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

Nayshawn Perkins, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Tucker v Annucci, 204 AD3d 1286, 1287 [3d Dept 2022]; Matter of Jefferies v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 190 AD3d 1250, 1250 [3d Dept 2021]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Jefferies v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
2021 NY Slip Op 00477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Tucker v. Annucci
204 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 02820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-perkins-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2023.