Matter of Jefferies v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision

177 N.Y.S.3d 924, 2022 NY Slip Op 06973
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2022
Docket533957
StatusPublished

This text of 177 N.Y.S.3d 924 (Matter of Jefferies v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jefferies v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 177 N.Y.S.3d 924, 2022 NY Slip Op 06973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Jefferies v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision (2022 NY Slip Op 06973)
Matter of Jefferies v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
2022 NY Slip Op 06973
Decided on December 8, 2022
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:December 8, 2022

533957

[*1]In the Matter of Anthony Jefferies, Petitioner,

v

New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date:November 10, 2022
Before:Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Pritzker, Fisher and McShan, JJ.

Anthony Jeffries, Beacon, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge refunded to petitioner's account. Although not referenced by the Attorney General, the penalty imposed included a recommended loss of good time, which also should be restored (see Matter of Clark v Leconey, 193 AD3d 1159, 1160 [3d Dept 2021]). As petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Morgan v Rodriguez, 207 AD3d 1022, 1022 [3d Dept 2022]; Matter of Tucker v Annucci, 204 AD3d 1286, 1287 [3d Dept 2022]).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Pritzker, Fisher and McShan, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Clark v. Leconey
2021 NY Slip Op 02040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Tucker v. Annucci
204 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Morgan v. Rodriguez
170 N.Y.S.3d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 N.Y.S.3d 924, 2022 NY Slip Op 06973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jefferies-v-new-york-state-dept-of-corr-community-nyappdiv-2022.