Matter of Dominguez v. Wendland

2021 NY Slip Op 04529, 196 A.D.3d 991, 148 N.Y.S.3d 398
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2021
Docket532758
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 04529 (Matter of Dominguez v. Wendland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Dominguez v. Wendland, 2021 NY Slip Op 04529, 196 A.D.3d 991, 148 N.Y.S.3d 398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Dominguez v Wendland (2021 NY Slip Op 04529)
Matter of Dominguez v Wendland
2021 NY Slip Op 04529
Decided on July 22, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:July 22, 2021

532758

[*1]In the Matter of Neftaly Dominguez, Petitioner,

v

Rosemarie Wendland, as Superintendent of Ulster Correctional Facility, Respondent.


Calendar Date:June 17, 2021
Before:Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

Neftaly Dominguez, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Shepherd v Annucci, 193 AD3d 1134, 1134 [2021]; Matter of Jefferies v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 190 AD3d 1250, 1250 [2021]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Vann v. Keyser
181 N.Y.S.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Tucker v. Annucci
204 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Wilson v. Annucci
201 A.D.3d 1290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 04529, 196 A.D.3d 991, 148 N.Y.S.3d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-dominguez-v-wendland-nyappdiv-2021.