Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci

2021 NY Slip Op 02030, 193 A.D.3d 1134, 141 N.Y.S.3d 737
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2021
Docket530917
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02030 (Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci, 2021 NY Slip Op 02030, 193 A.D.3d 1134, 141 N.Y.S.3d 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Shepherd v Annucci (2021 NY Slip Op 02030)
Matter of Shepherd v Annucci
2021 NY Slip Op 02030
Decided on April 1, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 1, 2021

530917

[*1]In the Matter of Eon Shepherd, Petitioner,

v

Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date: March 5, 2021
Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

Eon Shepherd, Stormville, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. As such, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Vilella v Annucci, 185 AD3d 1362, 1362 [2020]; Matter of Brown v Annucci, 181 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2020]).

Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Romano v. Kelly
2026 NY Slip Op 00042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Matter of Vann v. Keyser
181 N.Y.S.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Hilgreen v. Pollard Excavating, Inc.
179 N.Y.S.3d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Patterson v. Keyser
170 N.Y.S.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
O'Toole v. Marist Coll.
2022 NY Slip Op 03560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Daire v. Sterling Ins. Co.
204 A.D.3d 1189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Cagino v. Levine
2021 NY Slip Op 06018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Loccenitt v. Annucci
2021 NY Slip Op 04531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Dominguez v. Wendland
2021 NY Slip Op 04529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02030, 193 A.D.3d 1134, 141 N.Y.S.3d 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-shepherd-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2021.