Matter of Upson v. Rich

2021 NY Slip Op 00353, 190 A.D.3d 1182, 136 N.Y.S.3d 799
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 2021
Docket531642
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00353 (Matter of Upson v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Upson v. Rich, 2021 NY Slip Op 00353, 190 A.D.3d 1182, 136 N.Y.S.3d 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Upson v Rich (2021 NY Slip Op 00353)
Matter of Upson v Rich
2021 NY Slip Op 00353
Decided on January 21, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 21, 2021

531642

[*1]In the Matter of Jamel Upson, Petitioner,

v

John Rich, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.


Calendar Date: January 4, 2021
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

Jamel Upson, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mirabella v Colvin, 172 AD3d 1807, 1807 [2019]; Matter of Billups v Annucci, 170 AD3d 1300, 1301 [2019]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Tucker v. Annucci
204 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Stubbs v. Venettozzi
204 A.D.3d 1215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Loccenitt v. Annucci
2021 NY Slip Op 04531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Harris v. Collado
2021 NY Slip Op 03102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Clark v. Leconey
2021 NY Slip Op 02040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00353, 190 A.D.3d 1182, 136 N.Y.S.3d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-upson-v-rich-nyappdiv-2021.