Martin v. State

805 So. 2d 859, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12842, 2001 WL 1042137
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 761 So. 2d 475
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 2001·No. No. 2D01-3374·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight A. Martin filed a notice of appeal in July 2001, appealing the denial of a postconviction motion. The trial court had actually entered two orders denying two separate postconviction motions within the thirty-day window for filing a notice of appeal. One of those motions was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and addressed jail credit issues. The other motion was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and addressed issues including ineffective assistance of counsel.

It appears that Mr. Martin may have intended to appeal only the denial of his motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a). Nevertheless, the record submitted to this court included the record for both motions. That record was transmitted before the time expired to appeal the motion pursuant to rule 3.850. Thus, Mr. Martin may have decided that another notice of appeal was unnecessary. Accordingly, we conclude that it is appropriate for this court to review both orders. Having reviewed those [860]*860orders, we determine that both orders are correct.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 805 So. 2d 859, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12842, 2001 WL 1042137 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

805 So. 2d 859 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.