Marshall v. State
816 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6587, 2002 WL 985487
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marshall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 796 So. 2d 631 →
Opinion
As we did in Birch v. State, 787 So.2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marshall v. State, 816 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6587, 2002 WL 985487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
816 So. 2d 244 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birch v. State
787 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)