Marshall v. State
816 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6587, 2002 WL 985487
This text of 816 So. 2d 244 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marshall v. State, 816 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6587, 2002 WL 985487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
As we did in Birch v. State, 787 So.2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Birch v. State
787 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
816 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6587, 2002 WL 985487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.