Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Birch v. State

Birch v. State

787 So. 2d 962, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8315, 2001 WL 686893
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-1373
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 787 So. 2d 962 (Birch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birch v. State, 787 So. 2d 962, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8315, 2001 WL 686893 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. This affir-mance is without prejudice to defendant presenting his claim for gain time administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if unsuccessful, thereafter filing a petition for writ of mandamus. See Baez v. State, 780 So.2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); [963]*963Allen v. State, 768 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. State
816 So. 2d 244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 962, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8315, 2001 WL 686893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birch-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.