Marshall v. State
This text of 723 So. 2d 923 (Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Anthony Marshall, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
That portion of the order below denying Rule 3.850 relief which upholds the constitutionality of the "Gort Act" is affirmed on the authority of Spann v. State, 719 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Elliard v. State, 714 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Holloway v. State, 712 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and *924 Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Contra Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). None of the other issues raised by the defendant merit reversal or discussion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
723 So. 2d 923, 1999 WL 9922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marshall-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.