Venero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Venero v. State

741 So. 2d 1189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12542, 1999 WL 743513

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 22, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2037

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 741 So. 2d 1189 (Venero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Venero v. State, 741 So. 2d 1189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12542, 1999 WL 743513 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment entered below in all respects. See § 790.235, Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Maxwell, 682 So.2d 83 (Fla.1996); Arnold v. State, 645 So.2d 418 (Fla.1994); Johnson v.. State, 726 So.2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Love v. State, 569 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We recognize that our position on the defendant’s constitutional challenge to his sentence undér Chapter 95-182 is in conflict with the position taken by the Second District in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). Accordingly, we certify conflict with Thompson.

Affirmed.

GERSTEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment entered below in all respects. See § 790.235, Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Maxwell, 682 So.2d 83 (Fla.1996); Arnold v. State, 645 So.2d 418 (Fla.1994); Johnson v.. State, 726 So.2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Love v. State, 569 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We recognize that our position on the defendant’s constitutional challenge to his sentence undér Chapter 95-182 is in conflict with the position taken by the Second District in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). Accordingly, we certify conflict with Thompson.

Affirmed.

GERSTEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 So. 2d 1189, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12542, 1999 WL 743513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/venero-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack