Marshall v. State

753 So. 2d 767, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2000 WL 296521
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2000·No. No. 1D98-2477·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence as a prison releasee reoffender. We reject appellant’s challenges to the constitutionality of section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). See Chambers v. State, 752 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Turner v. State, 745 So.2d 351, 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), citing Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999). We affirm the other issues presented without further comment.

Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, as in Woods, we certify the following question to [768]*768the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ.,CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 753 So. 2d 767, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2000 WL 296521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

753 So. 2d 767 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. State
789 So. 2d 969 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)