Marshall v. State

734 So. 2d 1139, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6834, 1999 WL 333098
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1999·No. No. 98-2756·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The revocation of appellant’s community control and probation is AFFIRMED, but the cause is REMANDED with directions to enter a written order conforming to the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. See Cone v. State, 677 So.2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall v. State, 734 So. 2d 1139, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6834, 1999 WL 333098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

734 So. 2d 1139 (Marshall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverside Roof Truss v. Board of Zoning
734 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)