Makins v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Makins v. District of Columbia

855 A.2d 280, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 198, 2004 WL 1574735

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 23, 2004

DocketNo. 02-SP-241

StatusPublished

This text of 855 A.2d 280 (Makins v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Makins v. District of Columbia, 855 A.2d 280, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 198, 2004 WL 1574735 (D.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed by ap-pellee, the District of Columbia, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and this court’s Answer to Certified Question of Law, contained in the opinion of the court filed December 18, 2003, see 838 A.2d 300 (2003) is hereby vacated.¹ An order setting the schedule for the filing of en banc briefs shall be issued shortly. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc in the month of June.

Associate Judge RUIZ would grant the petition for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI