Mack v. State

702 So. 2d 299, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13987, 1997 WL 764472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5866
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1997·No. No. 96-4767·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence but reverse the imposition of a lien in the amount of $250.00 for the services of the Public Defender. At the time of sentencing, the defendant was not advised of his right to contest the lien. As we explained in Neal v. State, 688 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), the failure to give notice of intent to impose a lien for the services of appointed counsel is fundamental error. Accordingly, we reverse the lien in this case notwithstanding the absence of an objection at the time of sentencing. On remand, the trial court may [300]*300impose the lien again provided the defendant is given notice and an adequate opportunity to contest the amount. In all other respects we affirm.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

MICKLE, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 702 So. 2d 299, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13987, 1997 WL 764472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 299 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. State
688 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)