Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mack v. State

762 So. 2d 574, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2000 WL 954965

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-1117

StatusPublished

This text of 762 So. 2d 574 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 762 So. 2d 574, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2000 WL 954965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Calvin Lamont Mack appeals from the denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief, arguing that his sentence is unconstitutional under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Defendant was sentenced as a Violent Career Criminal under the Gort Act for offenses committed on March 5,1997. Defendant is within the window period to challenge his sentence. The window period applies to offenses committed between October 1, 1995 through May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000).

The sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Calvin Lamont Mack appeals from the denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief, arguing that his sentence is unconstitutional under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Defendant was sentenced as a Violent Career Criminal under the Gort Act for offenses committed on March 5,1997. Defendant is within the window period to challenge his sentence. The window period applies to offenses committed between October 1, 1995 through May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000).

The sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 So. 2d 574, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2000 WL 954965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack