Mack v. State

762 So. 2d 574, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2000 WL 954965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 1154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1117·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Calvin Lamont Mack appeals from the denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief, arguing that his sentence is unconstitutional under State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Defendant was sentenced as a Violent Career Criminal under the Gort Act for offenses committed on March 5,1997. Defendant is within the window period to challenge his sentence. The window period applies to offenses committed between October 1, 1995 through May 24, 1997. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000).

The sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 762 So. 2d 574, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8762, 2000 WL 954965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

762 So. 2d 574 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Thompson
750 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)