Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mack v. State

694 So. 2d 130, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5866, 1997 WL 282860

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-29

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 694 So. 2d 130 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5866, 1997 WL 282860 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal we affirm the revocation of community control and the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, on remand the trial court is directed to enter an amended order revoking community control, stating the terms and conditions of community control that have been violated. Houston v. State, 688 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Sanchez v. State, 675 So.2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Vezina v. State, 667 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 510 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for this clerical correction. Bontrager v. State, 678 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal we affirm the revocation of community control and the judgment and sentence without discussion. However, on remand the trial court is directed to enter an amended order revoking community control, stating the terms and conditions of community control that have been violated. Houston v. State, 688 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Sanchez v. State, 675 So.2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Vezina v. State, 667 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Frazier v. State, 571 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 510 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for this clerical correction. Bontrager v. State, 678 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 So. 2d 130, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5866, 1997 WL 282860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack