Vezina v. State

667 So. 2d 294, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9656, 1995 WL 539051
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 1995·No. No. 95-251·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence without discussion. However, on remand, the trial court is directed to enter an amended order revoking community control, stating the grounds upon which revocation was based following our previous remand.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vezina v. State, 667 So. 2d 294, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9656, 1995 WL 539051 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

667 So. 2d 294 (Vezina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack v. State
694 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Bontrager v. State
678 So. 2d 518 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)