Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robinson v. State

603 So. 2d 50, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8067, 1992 WL 170970

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1992

DocketNo. 92-490

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 603 So. 2d 50 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 603 So. 2d 50, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8067, 1992 WL 170970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Robinson has appealed an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.

Robinson pled guilty to and was convicted of an unnamed offense, and sentenced as an habitual felony offender on February 5,1991. He did not appeal. Robinson filed the instant motion on January 23, 1992, alleging that his counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that section 775.084, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject rule of the Florida Constitution. See Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court denied the motion, finding that review of Johnson was pending in the Florida Supreme Court and thus the case was not yet final.

The motion was correctly denied. First of all, the Johnson ruling on single-subject constitutionality had not been made at the time Robinson was sentenced. Further, the constitutionality argument raised by Robinson will not be considered if habituali-zation would have occurred under the pre-amendment statute. King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Robinson’s motion does not allege nor can we tell from its contents that he would not have been habitualized under the pre-amendment statute. Therefore, it states, no grounds for relief on this issue, and was properly denied.

Affirmed.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry Robinson has appealed an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.

Robinson pled guilty to and was convicted of an unnamed offense, and sentenced as an habitual felony offender on February 5,1991. He did not appeal. Robinson filed the instant motion on January 23, 1992, alleging that his counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that section 775.084, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject rule of the Florida Constitution. See Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court denied the motion, finding that review of Johnson was pending in the Florida Supreme Court and thus the case was not yet final.

The motion was correctly denied. First of all, the Johnson ruling on single-subject constitutionality had not been made at the time Robinson was sentenced. Further, the constitutionality argument raised by Robinson will not be considered if habituali-zation would have occurred under the pre-amendment statute. King v. State, 585 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Robinson’s motion does not allege nor can we tell from its contents that he would not have been habitualized under the pre-amendment statute. Therefore, it states, no grounds for relief on this issue, and was properly denied.

Affirmed.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

603 So. 2d 50, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8067, 1992 WL 170970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack