Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perez v. State

590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 137, 1992 WL 1340

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 1992

DocketNo. 90-3238

StatusPublished

This text of 590 So. 2d 1137 (Perez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perez v. State, 590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 137, 1992 WL 1340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially dismissed this appeal on the belief that it had been filed untimely. On appellant’s pro se motion, we agreed that the appeal was in fact timely, and reinstated it by order dated December 5, 1991.

Having considered appellant’s brief as well as defense counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we grant the motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence appealed.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI