MARKEY MORRISON vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 2023·No. 22-2605·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D22-2605

LT Case No. 2018-CF-002600

MARKEY MORRISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Peter M. Brigham, Judge.

Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and Jane Almy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

August 25, 2023

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the revocation of probation and the judgment and sentence imposed upon Morrison, as well as

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

the trial court’s order denying Morrison’s motion to withdraw his plea. Because the record does not include a written revocation order that identifies the terms and conditions of probation violated, the trial court on remand is instructed to enter a written revocation order that specifies the terms and conditions of probation that Morrison was found to have violated as orally pronounced. See Barber v. State, 342 So. 3d 297, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130, 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARKEY MORRISON vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

MARKEY MORRISON vs STATE OF FLORIDA (MARKEY MORRISON vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Mack v. State
694 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)