Mack v. State

655 So. 2d 1251, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5750, 1995 WL 322248
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1995·No. No. 95-00076·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Montrey Mack appeals the summary denial of his timely filed motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Mack contends that prior to entering his guilty pleas, he was not advised about the maximum penalties, including minimum mandatory sentences, he was facing as a violent habitual felony offender. The trial court’s failure to advise him at the change of plea hearing of the minimum mandatory sentences is ground for relief. See State v. Wilson, 395 So.2d 520 (Fla.1981); Key v. State, 599 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

The plea colloquy, which the trial court attached to its order denying Mack’s motion, actually supports Mack’s contention. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Mack’s motion and remand with directions to the trial court to offer Mack the opportunity to withdraw his guilty pleas.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. State, 655 So. 2d 1251, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5750, 1995 WL 322248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 1251 (Mack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metcalfe v. Metcalfe
655 So. 2d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)