Lozano v. Lozano

52 S.W.3d 141, 44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 499, 2001 Tex. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 33216152
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 2001
Docket99-0121
StatusPublished
Cited by353 cases

This text of 52 S.W.3d 141 (Lozano v. Lozano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lozano v. Lozano, 52 S.W.3d 141, 44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 499, 2001 Tex. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 33216152 (Tex. 2001).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We grant, in part, the motion for rehearing of Blanca, Monica and Alex Lozano, withdraw our opinion dated December 14, 2000, and substitute the following in its place.

Here, we decide whether there is legally sufficient evidence to uphold a jury verdict under Texas Family Code section 42.003, which provides a cause of action to a person with a possessory right to a child against one who aids or assists in interfering with that right.1

[144]*144Deana Lozano and Juan Antonio Loza-no, Jr. (“Junior”) are the parents of Bianca Lozano. When Deana and Junior separated, the court awarded Deana temporary custody of Bianca and gave Junior visitation rights. During one of those visits, Junior and Bianca disappeared, and neither has since been located. Deana sued Junior’s parents, Juan Antonio Lozano, Sr. and Blanca Suarez Lozano; and his siblings, Monica Lozano, Eduardo Lozano (“Alex”), and Sandra Lozano Warner (collectively the “Lozanos”), under Texas Family Code section 42.003 for allegedly aiding and assisting in Junior’s interference with her possessory rights. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury verdict, awarding Deana $1,000,000 against the defendants, jointly and severally, for the interference-with-possessory-rights claim, and an additional $1.2 million in punitive damages against the various defendants individually ($300,000 against each parent, and $200,000 against each sibling). The court of appeals reversed, holding that there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding regarding any of the Lozanos. 983 S.W.2d 787. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Because there is some evidence to support the jury’s determination that Blanca Lozano, Monica Lozano and Alex Lozano aided or assisted Junior in taking or retaining possession of Bianca or in concealing her whereabouts, the Court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals as to these defendants and remands the cause to that court for consideration of respondents’ remaining points of error. Because there is no evidence that Sandra Lozano Werner or Juan Lozano aided or assisted Junior in taking or retaining possession of Bianca, the Court affirms the court of appeals’ judgment that plaintiff take nothing from these defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

David Barnes v. Justin M. Walsh
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
in Re Kuraray America, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court, 2022
in Re Estate of Ava Lorene Mahaffey
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
Jodi Strobach v. WesTex Community Credit Union
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
in Re Commitment of Aaron Gipson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
Brian Williams v. Shawntay Wiliams
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
State v. v. T.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
in the Interest of K.M.J., a Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
in the Interest of C.A.D.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 S.W.3d 141, 44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 499, 2001 Tex. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 33216152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lozano-v-lozano-tex-2001.