Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

149 S.W.3d 884, 356 Ark. 369, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 145

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 4, 2004

DocketCA 03-1099

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 149 S.W.3d 884 (Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 149 S.W.3d 884, 356 Ark. 369, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 145 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Mary Linker-Flores’s counsel, Anne Orsi Smith, moves this court to be relieved as counsel in the appeal of Appellant’s termination of parental rights. Smith bases her motion on the assertions that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal and that she would incur substantial costs and expend great time, without the expectation of a flail recovery, in the pursuit of an appeal.

In 1989, the Arkansas General Assembly adopted the view that counsel shall be provided for indigent parents in termination cases “at all stages of the proceedings.” 1989 Ark. Acts 273, § 15, now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316(h)(1) (Supp. 2003); see also Brown v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 330 Ark. 497, 954 S.W.2d 270 (1997). Because Appellant is entitled to representation on appeal, we deny Smith’s motion to be relieved. Further, we order the parties to this matter to brief the issue of whether counsel representing a parent in a termination proceeding should be required to file a no-merit brief, comparable to that required under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), where there appears to be no meritorious grounds for appeal. This motion will be treated as a case and an appropriate briefing schedule will be established by the clerk of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Mary Linker-Flores’s counsel, Anne Orsi Smith, moves this court to be relieved as counsel in the appeal of Appellant’s termination of parental rights. Smith bases her motion on the assertions that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal and that she would incur substantial costs and expend great time, without the expectation of a flail recovery, in the pursuit of an appeal.

In 1989, the Arkansas General Assembly adopted the view that counsel shall be provided for indigent parents in termination cases “at all stages of the proceedings.” 1989 Ark. Acts 273, § 15, now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316(h)(1) (Supp. 2003); see also Brown v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 330 Ark. 497, 954 S.W.2d 270 (1997). Because Appellant is entitled to representation on appeal, we deny Smith’s motion to be relieved. Further, we order the parties to this matter to brief the issue of whether counsel representing a parent in a termination proceeding should be required to file a no-merit brief, comparable to that required under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), where there appears to be no meritorious grounds for appeal. This motion will be treated as a case and an appropriate briefing schedule will be established by the clerk of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W.3d 884, 356 Ark. 369, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linker-flores-v-arkansas-department-of-human-services-ark-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack