Langley v. Prudential Mortg. Capital Co., LLC

554 F.3d 647, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2648, 2009 WL 233353

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
• Decided: February 3, 2009
• Docket: 08-5032
• Status: Published

Opinions

ORDER

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and no judge of this court having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for panel rehearing and concludes that the petition for panel rehearing should be denied. Accordingly, the petitions are denied.

The petition for rehearing is denied. The district court’s order below was explicitly based in part on the invalidity of the forum selection clause. As explained in the per curiam opinion, that analysis was not correct, and the preliminary injunctive relief based on that analysis was therefore reversed. Rehearing is accordingly not warranted.