Lane v. State

182 So. 3d 891, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 121594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lane v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 2016·No. No. 1D15-4894·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking one ground of the motion with leave-, to amend, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

. THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lane v. State, 182 So. 3d 891, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 393, 2016 WL 121594 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

182 So. 3d 891 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)