Lane v. State
168 So. 3d 1276, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841, 2015 WL 4366608
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2015·No. No. 5D13-4238·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Instructional error, if any, even if fundamental, was waived when Appellant requested the now challenged instruction. See Armstrong v. State, 579 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1991). Relief on this claim, if any, must await timely postconviction proceedings. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lane v. State, 168 So. 3d 1276, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10841, 2015 WL 4366608 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
168 So. 3d 1276 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bruce Fuller v. State
257 So. 3d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)