Ladd v. United States
This text of 646 F.3d 910 (Ladd v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Defendant-Appellee, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants. The court granted leave to Rails-To-Trails Conservancy to file a brief amicus curiae.
The petition for panel rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and brief ami-cus curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition of Defendant-Appellee for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Defendant-Appellee for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on June 2, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
646 F.3d 910, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10569, 2011 WL 2043242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ladd-v-united-states-cafc-2011.