Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Killings v. State

Killings v. State

567 So. 2d 60, 1990 WL 142515
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1990
Docket89-2162
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 567 So. 2d 60 (Killings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Killings v. State, 567 So. 2d 60, 1990 WL 142515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

567 So.2d 60 (1990)

Jimmy Lee KILLINGS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 3, 1990.

Robert E. Stone of Sullivan, Stone, Sullivan, LaJoi & Thacker, Vero Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We agree that the trial court did not err in determining that appellant's motion to correct his sentence should be denied. Contrary to appellant's claim, it does not appear that his sentences on all five (5) counts were ordered to be served consecutively. Rather, it appears that Counts II, III, V and VI were ordered to be served consecutively to Count I, but concurrently with each other. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (1987). Furthermore, any complaint appellant may have about the Department of Corrections' interpretation of these sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by mandamus in the circuit court.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
73 So. 3d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Edward v. State
966 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Gillespie v. State
910 So. 2d 322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Washington v. State
851 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Grant v. State
837 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Colson v. State
830 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Lickman v. State
810 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jasmin v. State
799 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Widel v. Venz
792 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Banks v. State
793 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Maxey v. State
783 So. 2d 1169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Smith v. State
782 So. 2d 965 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Caldeira v. State
779 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Swinney v. State
757 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Levine v. State
764 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Holveck v. State
730 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Moore v. Peavey
729 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Scott v. State
715 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Reese v. State
707 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Singletary v. Benton
693 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 60, 1990 WL 142515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/killings-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.