Caldeira v. State

779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1855, 2001 WL 167016
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-39
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 601 (Caldeira v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldeira v. State, 779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1855, 2001 WL 167016 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Any complaint appellant may have about how the Department of Corrections interprets his sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Killings v. State
567 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1855, 2001 WL 167016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldeira-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.