Colson v. State
This text of 830 So. 2d 194 (Colson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nathan COLSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nathan Colson, Century, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Colson appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion. The summary denial of the motion challenging the *195 Department of Corrections' calculation of appellant's maximum release date is affirmed, without prejudice to his seeking relief from the Department of Corrections. If he is not satisfied after exhausting his administrative remedies, then appellant can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
GUNTHER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
830 So. 2d 194, 2002 WL 31422883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colson-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.