Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lickman v. State

Lickman v. State

810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 2002 WL 342078
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-3827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 810 So. 2d 1016 (Lickman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lickman v. State, 810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 2002 WL 342078 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant seeking relief from the Department of Corrections, and, if that does not produce the desired relief, filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county in which she is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (holding that the Department of Correction’s interpretation of sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by mandamus in the circuit court).

FARMER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weber v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles
845 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 2002 WL 342078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lickman-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.