Lickman v. State
810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 2002 WL 342078
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2002·No. No. 4D01-3827·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant seeking relief from the Department of Corrections, and, if that does not produce the desired relief, filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county in which she is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (holding that the Department of Correction’s interpretation of sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by mandamus in the circuit court).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lickman v. State, 810 So. 2d 1016, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2363, 2002 WL 342078 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
810 So. 2d 1016 (Lickman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weber v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles
845 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)