Maxey v. State

783 So. 2d 1169, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5160, 2001 WL 388067
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-4508
StatusPublished

This text of 783 So. 2d 1169 (Maxey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxey v. State, 783 So. 2d 1169, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5160, 2001 WL 388067 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Calvin Maxey appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm, noting that appellant must address his complaints about how the Department of Corrections interprets his sentences through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by petition for extraordinary writ filed in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Killings v. State
567 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 So. 2d 1169, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5160, 2001 WL 388067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxey-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.