Kelley v. LaForce

First Circuit

Kelley v. LaForce

279 F.3d 130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2002

Docket00-2543

StatusPublished

This text of 279 F.3d 130 (Kelley v. LaForce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelley v. LaForce, 279 F.3d 130 (1st Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

279 F.3d 130

Michael K. Kelley and Lenore T. Kelley, Plaintiffs, Appellants
v.
Joseph W. Laforce, Robert Fontaine, Melanie A. Jenkins, David Darrin, Richard Chabot, Douglas Blood, Peter Fullam and the Town of North Brookfield, Massachusetts.

No. 00-2543.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

February 8, 2002.

THIS OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE BOUND VOLUME AT THE REQUEST OF THE COURT. SEE 288 F.3d 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

279 F.3d 130

Michael K. Kelley and Lenore T. Kelley, Plaintiffs, Appellants
v.
Joseph W. Laforce, Robert Fontaine, Melanie A. Jenkins, David Darrin, Richard Chabot, Douglas Blood, Peter Fullam and the Town of North Brookfield, Massachusetts.

No. 00-2543.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

February 8, 2002.

THIS OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE BOUND VOLUME AT THE REQUEST OF THE COURT. SEE 288 F.3d 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 F.3d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelley-v-laforce-ca1-2002.