Kearns v. Biltwell Chair & Furniture Co.

23 S.E.2d 310, 222 N.C. 438, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 119
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 16, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 23 S.E.2d 310 (Kearns v. Biltwell Chair & Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kearns v. Biltwell Chair & Furniture Co., 23 S.E.2d 310, 222 N.C. 438, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 119 (N.C. 1942).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

There is ample evidence to support the findings of fact made by the Industrial Commission, and, on the facts found, the award appears to be correct.

To debate the different inferences which the parties seek to draw from the evidence would be to travel again the same ground covered by the Industrial Commission. The findings of fact, supported as they are by competent evidence, are “conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact” (N. C. Code 1939, sec. 8081 [ppp]), and on appeal are not subject to review by the Superior Court or this Court, even though we might be inclined to a contrary view if permitted to review the factual deter- *439 ruinations. Lassiter v. Tel. Co., 215 N. C., 227, 1 S. E. (2d), 542; Beach v. McLean, 219 N. C., 521, 14 S. E. (2d), 515; Reed v. Lavender Bros., 206 N. C., 898, 172 S. E., 877; Greer v. Laundry, 202 N. C., 729, 164 S. E., 116.

The record presents only a factual dispute, which the Commission has resolved in favor of the injured employee.

Affirmed.

Barnhill, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West v. McBane-brown Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2002
Searcy v. Branson
116 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
English Mica Co. v. Avery County Board of Education
100 S.E.2d 72 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Conner v. United States Rubber Co.
94 S.E.2d 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Singleton v. D. T. Vance Mica Co.
69 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Singleton v. DT Vance Mica Co.
69 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Tucker v. Lowdermilk
63 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.
46 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.
44 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
Riddick v. Richmond Cedar Works
43 S.E.2d 850 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co.
41 S.E.2d 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
Creighton v. . Snipes
40 S.E.2d 612 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Rewis v. . Insurance Co.
38 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Rewis v. New York Life Insurance
226 N.C. 325 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Fields v. Tompkins-Johnston Plumbing Co.
32 S.E.2d 623 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Brown v. Carolina Aluminum Co.
32 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.
31 S.E.2d 918 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E.2d 310, 222 N.C. 438, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearns-v-biltwell-chair-furniture-co-nc-1942.