DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.

44 S.E.2d 77, 227 N.C. 684, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 506
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 24, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 44 S.E.2d 77 (DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeVine v. Dave Steel Co., 44 S.E.2d 77, 227 N.C. 684, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 506 (N.C. 1947).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Without adopting all the reasons assigned by the hearing Commissioner, and approved by the Full Commission, in support of the conclusions reached, we think the record discloses facts sufficient to sustain the award.

The deceased was engaged in his regular work. He accidentally fell and suffered a fatal blow when the back of his head came in contact with the concrete platform on which he was standing. The exact cause of the fall is not determined, although it is found that it was an accident arising out of the employment. Robbins v. Hosiery Mills, 220 N. C., 246, 17 S. E. (2d), 20. It occurred while the employee was in the discharge of his duties, and it resulted in his death. This permits the inference, which .the Commission has drawn, that it was, a compensable injury. Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N. C., 325, 38 S. E. (2d), 97; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766, 32 S. E. (2d), 320. To say the death was due to physical seizure, unrelated to the employment, even if regarded the more plausible view, would be to reject the opposing inferences which support the fact-finding body. Hegler v. Cannon Mills, 224 N. C., 669, 31 S. E. (2d), 918. Moreover, where the record is such as to permit either finding, the factual determinations of the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal to the Superior Court and in this Court. Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438, 23 S. E. (2d), 310.

*686 Tbe cases of Rewis and Brown, above cited, are in full support of tbe conclusion bere reached. "We are content to rest our decision on wbat was said in these two cases.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavis v. TLC Home Health Care
616 S.E.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Rackley v. Coastal Painting
570 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Boney v. Winn Dixie, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2002
Tharp v. Southern Gables, Inc.
481 S.E.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Hollar v. Montclair Furniture Co., Inc.
269 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
King v. Exxon Co.
266 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Calhoun v. Kimbrell's, Inc.
170 S.E.2d 177 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
Taylor v. Twin City Club
132 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Cole v. GUILFORD COUNTY AND HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO.
131 S.E.2d 308 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Bagwell v. Ernest Burwell, Inc.
88 S.E.2d 611 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Poteete v. North State Pyrophyllite Co.
82 S.E.2d 693 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Henderson v. Celanese Corp.
104 A.2d 720 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.
63 S.E.2d 173 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Cooper v. Colonial Ice Co.
51 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Hunter v. . Peirson
49 S.E.2d 653 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 S.E.2d 77, 227 N.C. 684, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devine-v-dave-steel-co-nc-1947.