Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co.

41 S.E.2d 281, 227 N.C. 173, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 359
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 26, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case turns on whether the Nicholsons were agents of the lumber company or independent contractors. The Commission found that they were independent contractors, and the Superior Court has approved. Beach v. McLean, 219 N. C., 521, 14 S. E. (2d), 515; Graham v. Wall, 220 N. C., 84, 16 S. E. (2d), 691; Bryson v. Lumber Co., 204 N. C., 664, 169 S. E., 276; Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N. C., 11, 29 S. E. (2d), 137. Even if the record were such as to permit a contrary finding, the determination of the Industrial Commission would be conclusive on appeal. Hegler v. Mills Co., 224 N. C., 669, 31 S. E. (2d), 918. To accept the plaintiffs’ version of the matter would require a rejection of the opposing inferences which support the fact-finding body. Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438, 23 S. E. (2d), 310; Lassiter v. Tel. Co., 215 N. C., 227, 1 S. E. (2d), 542.

No reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co., 41 S.E.2d 281, 227 N.C. 173, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 359 (N.C. 1947).

41 S.E.2d 281 (Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Colonial Ice Co.
51 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Plumtree School for Boys, Inc.
51 S.E.2d 477 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)