Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co.
This text of 41 S.E.2d 281 (Bell v. Williamston Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case turns on whether the Nicholsons were agents of the lumber company or independent contractors. The Commission found that they were independent contractors, and the Superior Court has approved. Beach v. McLean, 219 N. C., 521, 14 S. E. (2d), 515; Graham v. Wall, 220 N. C., 84, 16 S. E. (2d), 691; Bryson v. Lumber Co., 204 N. C., 664, 169 S. E., 276; Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N. C., 11, 29 S. E. (2d), 137. Even if the record were such as to permit a contrary finding, the determination of the Industrial Commission would be conclusive on appeal. Hegler v. Mills Co., 224 N. C., 669, 31 S. E. (2d), 918. To accept the plaintiffs’ version of the matter would require a rejection of the opposing inferences which support the fact-finding body. Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438, 23 S. E. (2d), 310; Lassiter v. Tel. Co., 215 N. C., 227, 1 S. E. (2d), 542.
No reversible error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 S.E.2d 281, 227 N.C. 173, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-williamston-lumber-co-nc-1947.