Home/Supreme Court/Kananen v. Califano

Kananen v. Califano

434 U.S. 939, 98 S. Ct. 429, 54 L. Ed. 2d 298, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 3896
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 7, 1977
DocketNo. 77-300
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 434 U.S. 939 (Kananen v. Califano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kananen v. Califano, 434 U.S. 939, 98 S. Ct. 429, 54 L. Ed. 2d 298, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 3896 (1977).

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fort Howard Senior Housing Associates, LLC v. United States
121 Fed. Cl. 636 (Federal Claims, 2015)
Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
956 F. Supp. 270 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Florida, Department of Insurance v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,775 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Hannon Electric Co. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,664 (Federal Claims, 1994)
Composite Laminates, Inc. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,453 (Federal Claims, 1992)
Textor v. Cheney
757 F. Supp. 51 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Tarif SHABAZZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
912 F.2d 532 (Second Circuit, 1990)
Horton Homes, Inc. v. United States
727 F. Supp. 1450 (M.D. Georgia, 1990)
Brahms v. United States
18 Cl. Ct. 471 (Court of Claims, 1989)
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Avco Embassy Pictures Corp. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. United Artists Corporation Buena Vista Distributing Co., Inc., Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation, Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation
850 F.2d 477 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
848 F.2d 976 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
850 F.2d 477 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Guiseppe SCIAROTTA, Appellee, v. Hon. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Appellant
837 F.2d 135 (Third Circuit, 1988)
Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United States
828 F.2d 759 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Boston Shipyard Corp. v. United States
33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,922 (Court of Claims, 1986)
Boynton Landscape Co. v. Dickinson
487 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Higginbotham v. Heckler
767 F.2d 408 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph Lombardo
737 F.2d 594 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
Moore v. State
452 So. 2d 559 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Rahill Corp. v. Urbanski
463 N.E.2d 765 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 U.S. 939, 98 S. Ct. 429, 54 L. Ed. 2d 298, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 3896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kananen-v-califano-scotus-1977.