Johnson v. State

416 S.W.3d 346, 2013 WL 6665015, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 867
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. ED 99197·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Oliver Johnson appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.085 amended motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 416 S.W.3d 346, 2013 WL 6665015, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1493 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

416 S.W.3d 346 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.