Johnson v. State

358 S.W.3d 584, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2012 WL 453732
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 2012·No. ED 95899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Don Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment .of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 358 S.W.3d 584, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 164, 2012 WL 453732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

358 S.W.3d 584 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baugh v. State
358 S.W.3d 584 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)