Baugh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baugh v. State

358 S.W.3d 584, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 166, 2012 WL 453733

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 14, 2012

DocketED 96005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 S.W.3d 584 (Baugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baugh v. State, 358 S.W.3d 584, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 166, 2012 WL 453733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Baugh (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court erred when it denied his claim that his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present alibi witnesses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI