Johnson v. State

283 S.W.3d 310, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 734, 2009 WL 1449080
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 2009·No. ED 91968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the motion court’s order and judgment granting of Deatonne D. Johnson’s (Movant) amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035. We have reviewed the bi*iefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We *311 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 283 S.W.3d 310, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 734, 2009 WL 1449080 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

283 S.W.3d 310 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Division of Employment Security
283 S.W.3d 310 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)