Johnson v. State

244 S.W.3d 289, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 183, 2008 WL 314592
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 2008·No. WD 68234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Johnson appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion made pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 (2007). He alleges that the plea court clearly erred in overruling the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Johnson contends that he was denied effective assistance when plea counsel failed to file a motion to suppress a confession made to the police under the influence of prescribed narcotics. We hold that the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous and thereby affirm its decision.

Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 244 S.W.3d 289, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 183, 2008 WL 314592 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

244 S.W.3d 289 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cross v. State
244 S.W.3d 289 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)